Legal Opinion
Dushane v. Beall
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 16, 1896No. 184PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
161 U.S. 513 (1896)
DUSHANE
v.
BEALL.
No. 184.
Supreme Court of United States.
Submitted March 2, 1896.
Decided March 16, 1896.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA.
Mr. Edward Campbell for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Leoni Melick for defendant in error.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.
We concur with the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania that the limitation of § 5057 of the Revised Statutes did not apply. That limitation is applicable only to suits growing out of disputes in respect of property and of rights of property of the bankrupt…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States Trust Co. v. Wabash Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Quincy, Missouri & Pacific Railroad v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Glenny v. LangdonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Phelps v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Sparhawk v. YerkesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Howe v. Howe & Owen Ball Bearing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Fleming v. CourtenaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903
- Matter of Application of ParraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Morgan v. OwnbeySuperior Court of Delaware · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.