Humphrey v. Midkiff
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Action by A. H. Humphrey against H. K, Midkiff. Judgment for plaintiff, and the Oil City Iron Works, Limited, was garnished. Judgment for plaintiff against the garnishee-was affirmed by the Court of Appeal, and the Oil' City Iron Works, Limited, applied for certiorari or writ of review.
1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, C. J.
This is a garnishment process, in which the plaintiff seeks to hold the garnishee liable for an amount he avers the garnishee owes to the defendant.
The facts are that plaintiff obtained a judgment against the defendant, Midkiff, and in his proceedings to garnishee the indebtedness he alleged that he propounded interrogatories to the defendant, “the Oil City Iron Works, Limited,” that were answered by Midkiff, secretary of the company, who was defendant in the original suit of Humphrey v. Midkiff, in which a judgment was rendered against the latter for the amount which plaintiff seeks to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Buddig v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
- Marks v. ReinbergSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1861
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sun Sales Co. v. HodgesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
- In Re BallardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1999
- United States v. FeazelDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1943
- Simon v. HulseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Bridgeman & Conway v. Korner Realty Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.