Legal Opinion

LDV Enterprises, Inc. v. Puma

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 30, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Philip Puma, Rose Puma, and Brikar Realty, Ltd., appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk *629County (Gowan, J.), dated August 31, 1999, as granted those branches of the plaintiffs motion which were to restore the action to the trial calendar and to add Anna Puma and 2365 A & J Catering, Inc., as additional defendants.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to add Anna Puma and 2365 A & J Catering, Inc., as additional defendants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lopez v. Imperial Delivery Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Coffey v. BrodskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Klein v. RauschmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. Perez v. GerardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. LDV Enterprises, Inc. v. PumaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Yanovsky v. 833 Flatbush, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API