Legal Opinion

Amicone v. Shoaf

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 26, 1993No. 610PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

Sausage and eggs!

Sausage and eggs!

$2.02 he refused to pay

So now in court it’s for us to say.

Sausage and eggs!

It wasn’t the price

The parties contend

It’s the principle, they pretend.

Sausage and eggs! $2.02 involved

A sum so easily resolved

But no give or take here

They insist on a legal atmosphere.

Oh, in Uncle Sam’s land

Any person in court may protest

But, dear Lord, the Judge says

From this test, please give me rest.

*284This case belongs in the “believe it or not” category. In better hands, the literature that could be inspired by the facts of this case would qualify this matter for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kelley v. General Teamsters, Chauffeurs, & Helpers, Local Union 249Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Miller v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Cucchi v. Rollins Protective Services Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Cucchi v. Rollins Protective Services Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. De Salle v. Penn Central Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cosmas v. Bloomingdales Bros., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. City Of Erie, Pennsylvania v. Guaranty National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Whittington v. Episcopal HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Gatter v. ZappileDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Buchleitner v. PererSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API