Legal Opinion · Dissent

Petersen v. Parry

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1968No. 10161Published

1Dissent

SMITH, Chief Justice,

with whom McFADDEN, Justice, concurs (dissenting) :

The accident out of which this action arose occurred during daylight and clear weather, on a straight, dry, level, two-lane paved highway, the paved portion of which was 38 feet wide,- — amply sufficient to permit the simultaneous passage of two automobiles, with no sight impediments at or near the scene of the accident.

The Owen G. Johnson automobile proceeding northerly, left no skid marks. The Brent T. Johnson vehicle proceeding southerly left skid marks extending the last 26 feet to the place of impact of the vehicles.…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Swoboda v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Adams v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Kendrick v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  5. Lundy v. HazenIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API