Legal Opinion

Sun Assets Corp. v. English Evangelical Lutheran Church

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtM. Henry Martuscello, J.

In an action to compel the defendant Church to specifically perform the terms of a contract for the sale of its property and to declare that the individual defendants herein are estopped to assert any rights in such premises, the defendants join in motions for summary judgment and for other relief.

This controversy arises by reason of the fact that the defendant Church contracted to sell the same property to two different unrelated parties. On September 26, 1958 the Church agreed to sell its property to the defendants Segal and Kurz for $40,230, receiving at the signing of the contract $4,000.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bostwick v. . BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Ziehen v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Clark v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Saperstein v. Mechanics & Farmers Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Catholic Foreign Mission Society of America v. OussaniNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Church of God of Prospect Plaza v. Fourth Church of ChristNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Church of God of Prospect Plaza v. Fourth Church of ChristAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Spuches v. Royal View, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  4. South Shore Skate Club, Inc. v. FatscherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  5. Spuches v. Royal View, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API