Legal Opinion

Davies v. Sutherland

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 16, 1932No. 20784Published

1Opinion of the CourtKornegay, J.

This ease comes from the district court of Choctaw county. The only point involved in it is whether or not the defendants in error, by virtue of trying to collect their judgment, in the court below, 'by proceeding in aid of execution, subjected themselves to a forfeiture of their judgment because of the provisions of chapter 188, Session Laws of 1915, which is as follows:

“Sec. 1. That the sixteenth clause of section 3342 of chapter 34, defining the exemptions of householders, of Revised Laws of Oklahoma 1910, annotated, be amended to read: ‘Seventy-five per cent, of all current wages or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Drumright v. KnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Emerson v. EmersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Archer v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API