Legal Opinion

Witkowski v. Burke

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 14, 1949PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The complaint herein was filed April 8, 1949, as a proceeding under Rule 3:81, superseding prerogative writs, and by motion made under Rule 3:81-4 the plaintiff applies for summary judgment.

While the complaint does not demand the performance of a ministerial act or duty (and there may be doubt of the applicability of Rule 3:81-4) defendant, allegedly because of the public importance of the controversy and defendant's representation in the briefs submitted on his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Camden v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
  2. Fagen v. MorrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  3. Conroy v. NultonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1965
  2. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API