Legal Opinion

McKay v. Wilhelm

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 30, 1942No. Gen. No. 42,104PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

Dwight McKay and Leslie H. Whipp, attorneys, represented the defendant August A. Wilhelm in a suit in the superior court and obtained a decree in his favor. Subsequently the case was appealed to the Supreme Court where the same attorneys secured an affirmance. Thereafter Dwight McKay died and this suit is brought by the executrix and Whipp to recover attorneys’ fees for services rendered in the appeal to the Supreme Court. The case was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict for the defendant, and plaintiffs appeal.

The complaint alleged that defendant promised to pay plaintiffs the fair…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Continental Can Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Fuchs & Lang Manufacturing Co. v. R. J. Kittredge & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Axton v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WallaceIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Schmalz v. ArnwineOregon Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fiorito v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Slater v. JacobsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. Roback v. RobackAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  4. Mueller v. SloanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API