Legal Opinion

Walsh Construction Co. v. City of Toledo

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided October 8, 2014No. Case No. 3:14 CV 2096Published

1Opinion of the Court

*1014 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING CLAIM FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge.

Introduction

The City of Toledo (“City”) has long struggled with sewer overflows. 1 Portions of the City’s sewer system collect both stormwater and wastewater from homes and businesses. Because of heavy rains, these combined sewers periodically overflow, threatening human health and the region’s ecosystem.

In 2002, the City and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency entered into a 20-year consent decree, addressing in part the sewer overflow discharges. See United States v. City of Toledo,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lansdowne v. Beacon Journal Publishing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. City of Dayton, ex rel. Scandrick v. City of Dayton Mayor McGeeOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Danis Clarkco Landfill Co. v. Clark County Solid Waste Management DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Leaseway Distribution Centers, Inc. v. Department of Administrative ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Wilson Bennett, Inc. v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API