Legal Opinion
Fontana v. EAR, a DIV. OF CABOT CORP.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 30, 1994No. 93 Civ. 7771 (AGS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHWARTZ, District Judge:
Defendant, E.A.R., a Division of Cabot Corporation, 1 moves pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to transfer this action to the District of Wyoming or, in the alternative, to the Southern District of Indiana. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is granted and this action is transferred to the District of Wyoming.
I. FACTS
Plaintiffs “Amended Verified Complaint”, filed on or about December 20, 1993 (the “Complaint”), alleges that he “resided and still resides” in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Complaint at ¶ 1. Plaintiff, however, in his reply…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Viacom International, Inc. v. Melvin Simon Productions, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Arrow Electronics, Inc. v. Ducommun Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Vaughn v. American Basketball Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Milgrim Thomajan & Lee P.C. v. Nycal Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- St. Regis Mohawk Tribe v. State of NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
3Cited by5 opinions
- Berman v. Informix Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- In Re Nematron Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- In Re Consolidated Parlodel LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Hamilton v. Accu-TekDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Robinson v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014