Legal Opinion

Ercanbrack v. Faris

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from District Conrt of Ada County. Honorable George H. Stewart, Judge. Judgment for plaintiff, from which defendants appeal. cite no authorities in their brief upon the point decided. cite no authorities not found in the opinion on petition for rehearing.

1Opinion of the Court

STOOKSLAGER, C. J. —

The plaintiffs (appellants) commenced this action in the district court to recover the sum of $2,925.35, together with interest from March 21, 1903. They allege that they are copartners doing business as C. F. Ercan-brack & Co., and that the defendants, A. W. Faris and F. S. Kesl, are copartners doing business as Faris & Kesl. Then follows an allegation that on or about the fifteenth day of April, 1902, defendants entered into a certain contract with D. W. Catts, H. R. Catts and G. H. Harvey, doing business as D. W. Catts & Son. A copy of this contract is made a part of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henry v. PechinDelaware County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1938
  2. Lawson v. DunseathNevada Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API