Legal Opinion

Dillon v. Hunt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the St. Louis Circuit Court, Thayer, J.

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The only question we have to consider in this case is, whether the petition states a cause of action. It states that, at the dates hereinafter mentioned, the plaintiffs were the lessees and occupiers of a store-room in which they had a stock of goods, and that the defendant was the owner of an adjoining building five stories high. It then continues as follows: —

“ Plaintiffs further state that on or about the fourteenth day of November, 1877, the interior .and combustible portion of said building, owned by defendant as aforesaid, were destroyed by fire, and certain interior and exterior brick…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago City v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  2. Hay v. . the Cohoes CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  3. Brown v. WernerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  4. Tremain v. . the Cohoes CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1849

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crenshaw v. UllmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. Bloecher v. Estate of DuerbeckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Dillon v. HuntSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Eberson v. Continental Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API