United States v. Dave
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
James Ralph Dave (“Dave”) was convicted by a jury of abusive sexual contact with a minor under twelve years of age, and the district court entered a judgment of conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2244(c). We *41have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and for the reasons stated below, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
During the trial, the government called Mr. Schimmel to testify as a lay witness. Schimmel was a tribal liaison who worked at the alleged victim’s school. He testified that he had received training in recognizing “abuse” in children, and he had noticed some “red flags”…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Janice Wallace, United States of America v. Elmore PennCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Mark Edwin CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Elizabeth Diane Downs v. Sonia HoytCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
3Cited by1 opinion
- King v. DePuy Orthopaedics IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023