Burks v. City of Licking
Missouri Court of Appeals
1DissentGarrison, Chief Judge
I respectfully dissent. My dissent, however, is limited to the conclusion reached in the principal opinion that Licking was authorized to purchase that portion of the land in question which lies outside the city limits.
§ 79.010 states, in pertinent part:
Any city of the fourth class in this state ... may receive and hold property, both real and personal, within such city, and may purchase, receive and hold real estate within or without such city for the burial of the dead; and may purchase, hold, lease, sell or otherwise dispose of any property, real or personal, it now owns or may hereafter…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bartley v. Special School District of St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- City of Kirkwood v. City of Sunset HillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Kansas City Star Co. v. FulsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- State Ex Rel. City of Republic v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- Kennedy v. City of NevadaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.