Boehm v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.
Defendant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict of guilty because, in order .to be guilty of the offense described in sec. 343.181, Stats., he must be charged with knowledge of the fact that he has caused injury to some one. ITe makes the contention here that he did not know that he had injured Beschta. His own testimony conclusively refutes that contention. He testified as follows:
“As I came along the street car going west I passed the street car right close to the intersection. Too late to avoid the accident this man came across the street with his head down…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
- In re CarlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Warner v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
- French v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Gaynon v. KruegerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. KiernanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Nicholas v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Veley v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Duenkel v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.