Legal Opinion

Young v. Sunderman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 7, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

It appears that the plaintiff, when arrested for possession of the slot machines involved herein, was discharged by the magistrate. Therefore, the machines may not be destroyed pursuant to the provisions of section 978 of the Penal Law. It is only where the magistrate finds that the machine was of a character suitable for gambling purposes and has been used by the possessor in violation of the article against gambling that he is to order it destroyed under that section.

Under the decision of the Court of Appeals in People v. Jennings (257 N. Y. 196) possession of the instant machines does not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kearney v. City of ElmiraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API