Whitehurst v. . Pettipher
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil actioN, tried before Brown, J., and a jury, at Fall Term, 1889, of Pamlico Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, J.:
The “case agreed5’ states: “The plaintiff made no exception whatever during the trial, nor to the charge. The jury found the issues in favor of the defendant. After the verdict the plaintiff moved for a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence, and made no other objection whatever.”
The motion was overruled, and judgment was entered against plaintiff. It needs no citation of authority that this Court will not review the refusal by the Court below of a motion to set aside a judgment as being against the weight of the evidence. Indeed, the point…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McKinnon v. . MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
3Cited by8 opinions
- Norton v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Goodman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Osborne v. . WilkesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Benton v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Humphrey v. Board of Trustees of Front Street Methodist Episcopal ChurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.