Legal Opinion

Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. Moss

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1955No. A-5100PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Justice.

The principal question in this case maybe stated as follows: If an adverse claimant in possession of land conveys the surface and reserves the minerals, does the continued possession of the surface by the grantee inure to the benefit of the grantor and ripen a title by limitation in favor of the latter to the minerals reserved by him? The question is considered in the latter part of this opinion and is answered in the affirmative.

Jack Moss and wife, plaintiffs, sued Houston Oil Company of Texas and American Republics Corporation, defendants, for title to and possession of part…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. KimballTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HudsonTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Cobb v. RobertsonTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Thomas v. Southwestern Settlement & Development Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Evitts v. RothTexas Supreme Court · 1884

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Radford v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Meek v. BowerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  3. Hinds v. KilloughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Rickel v. ManningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  5. Smith v. Temple Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API