Legal Opinion

Dinkelspiel v. New York Evening Journal Public Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to strike out parts of an answer for libel.

1Opinion of the CourtClabke, J.

The action is to recover damages for an alleged libel published by the defendant in reporting part of the testimony given by the plaintiff while a witness in an action for divorce in this court. The words complained of are as follows : “ Dinkelspiel also admits club expelled him for cheating at cards. * * * Were you expelled from a club in the upper part of this State for cheating at cards? A. Yes, sir.” Motion is made to strike out as irrelevant and redundant several paragraphs of the answer which consists of a defense of privilege and a plea in mitigation and reduction of damages. The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Douglass v. Phenix InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Root v. King & VerplanckNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  3. Mattice v. . WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Bradner v. . FaulknerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. Turton v. New York Recorder Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Byrne v. News Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Irwin Co. v. Magazines of Industry, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API