Legal Opinion

State v. Chapple

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 1993No. 19856PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINMILL, Judge pro tem.

This is an appeal by the state from an order granting defendant Val C. Chappie’s motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to the execution of a search warrant at Chappie’s business. The state argues that the evidence should not have been suppressed because there was a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed when the warrant was issued. For the reasons explained below, we affirm.

This case stems from Val Chappie and Jill Olsen’s alleged involvement in the trafficking of methamphetamine in Idaho Falls during the fall of 1991. On September 24,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. State v. CarlsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State v. ChandlerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State v. FisherIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. StevensIdaho Court of Appeals · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API