Dupas v. Wassell
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
CALDWELL, District Judge.
By consent of parties this cause was tried before the-court
The action is brought to recover for the use and occupation of a parcel of ground, comprising part of what is known as the “Hot Springs Reservation.” It is not any part of . the quarter section of that reservation to which parties have for many years been asserting title by pre-emption, and a New Madrid location.
The plaintiff’s own evidence discloses the fact that he has no title, legal or equitable, to the parcel of ground in question, and no pretense of right or claim other than a mere “squatter” on the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hatfield v. WallaceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1841
- Cain v. LeslieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1854
- Pelham v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1842
- Carr v. AllisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1838
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lukens v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Shorman v. EakinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
- Light v. ConoverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
- Lingle v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Mayes v. Cherokee Strip Live Stock Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.