Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Estate of Shirk

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 8, 1961No. 42,261Published

1DissentFatzer, J.

In my judgment the appeal should not be dismissed. G. S. 1949, 60-717 and 60-718 expressly provide that the appellant could demur to each of the separate defenses alleged by the executor, and reply to the residue of the answer. Under the statute (G. S. 1949, 60-3302, second) and our decisions (Sanik v. Shryock Realty Co., 156 Kan. 641, 645, 135 P. 2d 545, and Bartholomew v. Guthrie, 71 Kan. 705, 81 P. 2d 491) a ruling on a demurrer, whether sustained or overruled, is appealable, and where, as here, it timely reaches this court through proper channels, is entitled to consideration on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dalton v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  2. Bartholomew v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Harmon v. JamesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Rockhill, Administrator v. TomasicSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  5. Sanik v. Shryock Realty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API