Skinner v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SULLIVAN, Judge
In this consolidated interlocutory appeal, Melissa Skinner (Skinner) and Brandon Cockrell (Cockrell) (collectively “Appellants”) challenge the trial courts’ denials of their motions to dismiss.
We affirm.
The facts relevant to this appeal reveal that on April 29,1999, the State separately charged 1 Appellants with Defrauding a Financial Institution, 2 a Class C felony. On September 21, 1999, each Appellant filed a Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Properly Charge the Defendant. The respective trial courts denied each Appellant’s motion to dismiss. On November 5,1999, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Beech v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- DURRETT v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1966
- Kindred v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
- Comer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Paul J. Coy v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Skinner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Dixey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Melissa Skinner/Brandon Cockrell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Robert Fultz v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.