Legal Opinion

In re Hill

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 22, 1947No. 5277PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the examiner finally rejecting claims 2 and 3 of an application for a. patent for “Improve-*1063merits in Dyed Textiles and Methods and Compositions for Producing Same.”

The claims read as follows:

2. A dye bath for textiles comprising an emulsion of a water-immiscible pigmented lacquer distributed in a continuous aqueous phase, the binder of the lacquer comprising a carbamide formaldehyde resin soluble in organic solvents, •and comprising not over 2.5% of the total dye bath, and being…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Application of JonesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Application of RipperCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  2. Application of Charles R. BarrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  3. Application of James R. Tiffin and Earl ErdmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  4. Application of Charles R. BarrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API