Legal Opinion

United States v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, Inc., AKA Sears, AKA Sears & Roebuck, Defendant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 26, 1989No. 88-5062PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

This case involves the claim that Sears conspired to defraud the United States government by overstating to customs agents the price it had paid for television receivers purchased from Japanese manufacturers. The current appeal is the fifth pretrial appeal and the fourth time that the government has appealed a dismissal of the criminal indictment in this case. The government appeals the district court’s dismissal of the indictment this time on the basis that the delay in spreading the appellate mandate violated the Sixth Amendment, Federal R.Crim.P. 48(b), and the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. National Medical Enterprises, Inc., and Nme Hospitals, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Harry H. Nance, United States of America v. Leon Stelly, United States of America v. Taybren LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yagman v. Republic InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1991
  2. (PC)Vera v. WardenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  3. United States v. BallamDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API