Kasper v. Oberlin College
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*370OPINION
By STEVENS, J.
It is the well-settled law of Ohio that, upon a motion to direct a verdict in favor of defendant upon the opening statement of counsel for plaintiff, the court is called upon to determine a legal question only, and in so doing- is neither permitted to weigh evidence nor to determine- any question of fact whatsoever. The court is required to assume that everything said in the opening statement is true, and that every reasonable inference favorable to plaintiff which may be drawn therefrom is true, leaving for determination by the court only the question as to whether such…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Denton v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Hamburger v. Cornell UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Susmann v. Younp Men's Christian Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Lossing v. . CushmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Old Folks & Orphan Childrens Home v. RobertsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
3Cited by3 opinions
- K & S Realty Co. v. RosenOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
- Gerend v. City of AkronOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
- State v. CovrettOhio Court of Appeals · 1993