Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Harnage, Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 19, 1935No. 23974PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This in an appeal from a judgment denying a writ of mandamus by plaintiff in error directing the county treasurer of Muskogee county to pay over to plaintiff, a deputy county assessor, the moneys derived from the $1 penalty for making arbitrary assessments against persons who failed to list their property for taxation with the county assessor for the fiscal years 1929-30 and 1930-31. The contention is that the arbitrary assessments involved were made by plaintiff as deputy county assessor of Muskogee county under and pursuant to the provisions of section 9666 C. O. S. 1921 (12582, O. S.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frost v. Corporation Comm'n of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Hurley v. Commission of Fisheries of Va.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Pottawatomie County v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. American Surety Co. of New York CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API