United States v. Stirewalt
U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KANTOR, Judge:
This represents the second occasion for this Court to review this case pursuant to Article 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 866, and the third time it has been before us. Because of the ease’s unusual procedural history, a brief recitation of its background is provided.
On 17 June 1997, Appellant was convicted of the following offenses by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members: four specifications of maltreatment by sexual harassment, one specification of rape, one specification of forcible sodomy, three specifications of assault…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RuppelCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. RosendahlCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. JoseyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. StirewaltU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. StirewaltCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. HutchisonU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
- United States v. HutchisonU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
- United States v. StirewaltCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004