Legal Opinion

Lumpkin v. Cofield

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 18, 1988No. 87-114PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal is from a judgment on a jury verdict for the plaintiff in his action for malicious prosecution and the tort of outrageous conduct. The jury awarded Stephen Cofield, a former employee of the Alabama Department of Industrial Relations ("DIR"), $50,000 against Don Lumpkin, an investigator with DIR, and $125,000 against William R. Heatherly, formerly the director of DIR and currently the assistant director of DIR. Lumpkin and Heatherly raise numerous issues, including whether they were immune from suit, whether the proof met the elements of the causes of action, whether the trial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. American Road Serv. Co. v. InmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Barnes v. DaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Aspinwall v. GowensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. DeStafney v. University of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Nat. SEC. Fire & Cas. Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Phillips v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. McMillian v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Thomas v. BSE Indus. Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Continental Cas. Ins. Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Willis v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API