Interest of E. S. K.

Phipps, Judge.

The father of E. S. K, age nine, J. N. K, age fourteen, E C. K, age thirteen, and F. L. K., age twelve, appeals the trial court’s order that terminated his parental rights to those children.1 He claims that there was not clear and convincing evidence that the deprivation was likely to continue. Because the evidence was sufficient to show that the deprivation was likely to continue, we affirm.

On appeal from a juvenile court’s decision to terminate parental rights . . . , we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the court’s decision and determine *36whether any rational…