Hurst v. Belle Valley (Vil.)
Noble Circuit Court
Error to Noble common pleas court; Cited and commented upon the following authorities: Ryan v.. Hoffman, 26 Ohio St. 109; Rhoades v. Toledo, 3 Circ. Dec. 325 (6 R. 9) : Easton v. Hyde Park, 9 Dec. 512 (6 N. P. 257); McGrew v. Elm-wood Place, 6 Circ. Dee. 106 (17 R. 676) ; Bond v. Madisonville, 1 Circ. Dec. 581 (2 R. 449); Findlay v. Pendleton, 62 Ohio St. 80 [56 N. E_ Rep. 649].
1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.
The council of the incorporated village of Belle Valley in this county duly passed a resolution and also an ordinance to build a dyke within said corporation and also to appropriate the private property of the plaintiff, Sarah Hurst, for that purpose, the costs of the same to be paid out of the general fund. After the passage of such resolution and ordi- ■ nance a proceeding was commenced by the solicitor on behalf of the village in the probate court of the county to assess the compensation to be paid to plaintiff as damages for such appropriation.
Immediately upon the commencement of such…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stahl v. JarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1830