Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Conger

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided October 12, 2005No. Civ.A. 04-570-CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

COFFMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs motion for judgment on the administrative record (DE 19). The court, having reviewed the record and being otherwise sufficiently advised, will grant the plaintiffs motion.

Background

The plaintiff, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), is responsible for administering benefits offered under the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program (“FLTCIP”), an insurance program established pursuant to the Long Term Care Security Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 9001, et seq., for the benefit of federal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Janet B. Davies Donald Davies v. Centennial Life Insurance Company, and Dun & Bradstreet Plan Services, Inc., Jerome J. Siegel, D.D.S., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. Provident Life and Accident Ins. Co. v. SharplessDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Russell D. CongerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Metro Life Ins Co v. CongerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API