Legal Opinion

Hagan v. Hagan

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 10, 1951No. 17526PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

We recognize the well-established rule that condonation of cruel treatment or other gi’ounds for divorce upon the condition that the acts complained of will not be repeated, will not prevent a divorce petition previously filed from proceeding to final judgment in favor of the complaining party, where the acts constituting grounds for divorce are repeated subsequently to the conditional condonation. Ozmore v. Ozmore, 41 Ga. 46; Harn v. Harn, 155 Ga. 502 (117 S. E. 383); Brewer v. Brewer, 205 Ga. 759 (55 S. E. 2d, 147). This rule, however, is not applicable in the present case.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gates v. GatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Harn v. HarnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  3. Moody v. MoodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Brewer v. BrewerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  5. Carawan v. CarawanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lindsay v. LindsaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. Walton v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  3. Clance v. ClanceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  4. Hagan v. HaganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Hagan v. HaganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API