Legal Opinion

Maynard v. Carey Construction Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 10, 1939PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

This suit, originally brought against the city of Fall River as well as The Carey Construction Company for injunctive relief against an alleged nuisance and also for damages, is now, after the cessation of the nuisance, prosecuted against the construction company alone for the recovery of damages.

The defendant is the owner of an abandoned quarry “of considerable area and great depth,” located in a sparsely settled section near the boundary of the built-up portion of the city. Prior to 1927 this quarry had been used as a dump. In 1927 the defendant gave the city’s superintend*531ent of streets…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Gray v. Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Stevens v. Rockport Granite Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Clifford v. Atlantic Cotton MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Nichols v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  5. Ainsworth v. LakinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Building Commissioner v. C. & H. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Kurtigian v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  3. Newcomb v. DredgeOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Nassr v. COMMONWEALTH NASSRMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API