Craig v. Atwood
Supreme Court of Alabama
In error from the County Court of Marengo. In this case Atwood had obtained thirteen judgments against Craig, and others, ■ his sureties to a bond as constable. A certiorari was prosecuted by Craig and one of his sureties, to the County Court, which on hearing was dismissed, on the ground that all the defendants had not joined in the appeal. Exception was taken to this decision of the Court, and the same assigned for error here.
1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.
It appears by the record in ibis canse, ( as disclosed in the petition of Craig for writs of certio-rari and supersedeas, that Atwood had recovered thirteen judgments against him, James H. Adams, John C. McGrew, William Anderson and John Lockart, his securities to his bond as constable. The Judge of the County Court granted the petition for writs of certiorari and supersedeas ; and ordered the clerk of his Court to issue the same upon Craig’s entering into bond with security in double the amount of each judgment before the magistrate (which amount was-stated in the petition:) the writs of…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Phillips v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910