Crandall v. Lynch
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Hearing on an appeal by the defendant from a judgment ■of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, entered upon a verdict for the plaintiff, directed by the court in an ■action of ejectment. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr, Chief Justice Alvey
delivered the opinion of the 'Court:
The appeal in this case is taken from a judgment rendered in an action of ejectment brought by the appellee, Catharine J. Lynch, against the appellants, Milton It. Crandall and Lena Crandall, his wife, to recover lot No. 44 in Saunders and Griffin’s subdivision of the east part of square No. 611, and the improvements, consisting of dwelling No. 33 N street, northwest, in the city of Washington. The plaintiff claims the premises as purchaser at a foreclosure sale under a deed of trust made by Katharina Smith, on October 24, 1894, to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Black v. WoodrowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
- Stebbins v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Hogan v. KurtzSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Siglar v. Van RiperNew York Supreme Court · 1833
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Yellow Cab Co. of D. C. v. RogersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943