Sureau v. Sureau
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Determination of the Appellate Term reversed and the order of the Municipal Court modified so as to strike therefrom the provision for the dismissal of the complaint, and a trial of the issues is directed. Whether the parties intended that the Nevada decree and its subsequent modifications should operate as a merger of the separation agreement and bar its survival of the decree is an issue of fact which should only be determined upon a trial. (Hettich v. Hettich, 304 N. Y. 8,14,15; Goldman V. Goldman, 282 N. Y. 296, 305; Schmehel V. Schmehel, 287 N. Y. 21, 26.) Present — Peck, P. J., Dore,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Schmelzel v. SchmelzelNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Hettich v. HettichNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
3Cited by9 opinions
- Howland v. StitzerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Richards v. RichardsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1956
- Haboush v. HaboushCivil Court of the City of New York · 1968
- Small v. SmallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Meyer v. MeyerNew York Supreme Court · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.