Legal Opinion
Maldonado v. Algil Holding Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 15, 2009PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff demonstrated a reasonable excuse by showing that his default resulted from law office failure to calendar and timely oppose defendant’s discovery motion (see Simpson v *532Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A., Inc., 48 AD3d 389, 392 [2008]), and also demonstrated merit to his cause (see Palermo v Lord & Taylor, 287 AD2d 258, 260 [2001]). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Roman, JJ.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Simpson v. Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Palermo v. Lord & Taylor, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by4 opinions
- Castellano v. Ann/Nassau Realty LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Castellano v. Ann/Nassau Realty LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Willner v. S Norsel Realties LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Willner v. S Norsel Realties LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022