Legal Opinion
Town of Sturbridge v. Mobil Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 29, 2002No. CIV.A. 01-40019-NMGPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GORTON, District Judge.
This case arises from the contamination of the water of Well No. 1 (“the Well”) in the Town of Sturbridge, Massachusetts (“the Town”), by the contaminant, Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (“MTBE”). It has been determined that the contaminant leaked into the soil from two nearby gasoline filling stations.
One of the stations is located at 365 Main Street in Sturbridge (“the Mobil site”) and is owned and operated by Defendant Mobil Corporation (“Mobil”). The other station is located at 400 Main Street in Sturbridge (“the ARCO/Shell site”). Defendant Atlantic…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Paterson-Leitch Company, Inc. v. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Riley v. PresnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Taygeta Corp. v. Varian Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Olsen v. BELL TELEPHONE LABORATORIES, W. ELECTRIC CO.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- One Wheeler Road Associates v. Foxboro Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lewis v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Mystic Landing, LLC v. Pharmacia Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006