Hartranft v. Meyer
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shiras
This was an action, brought by the Arm of Meyer & Dickinson, in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia, against. *545the collector of customs for that district, to recover duties which they allege to have been illegally assessed against certain articles- imported by them. The action was certified to and tried' in the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. -The collector sued out a writ of error, which is now prosecuted in this court by his executrix.
The issues that were tried in the court below arose under the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hartranft v. LangfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Robertson v. EdelhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
3Cited by13 opinions
- Magone v. WiedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Meyer v. CadwaladerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
- United States v. Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Chrystal v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Robinson v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.