Legal Opinion · Concurrence

J.H. v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 2004No. 49A05-0311-JV-566Published

1ConcurrenceBailey, Judge

I concur with the majority's holding that, because seventeen-year-old J.H. admitted to committing the offense of driving a vehicle without a license, he may only challenge his adjudication of delinquency in a subsequent motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Indiana Trial Rule 60. See, eg., M.Y. v. State, 681 N.E.2d 1178, 1179 (Ind.Ct.App.1997). However, I write. separately to express my concern that the Marion Superior court's jurisdiction and subsequent adjudication of J.H. as a juvenile delinquent, rather than an adult offender, may be in contravention of Article I, Section 23 of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Collins v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. School City of Rushville v. HayesIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. M.Y. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Quinn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API