Legal Opinion

Strauss v. Merchants Loan & Trust Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 10, 1905No. Gen. No. 11,890Published

Action of replevin. Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Jesse Holdom, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown

In August, 1901, P. J. Sexton brought suit in replevin against Bernard Strauss in the Superior Court of Cook county, and under- the writ were taken and turned over to Sexton six horses, several sets of harness and three coal wagons. Mr. Sexton gave a replevin bond in the usual form in the sum of $3,000, conditioned that he should prosecute his suit to effect and without delay and make return of the property if return should be awarded. The bond was signed by Patrick J. Sexton and John M. L. Sexton.

An ordinary declaration in replevin having been filed by Mr. Sexton, the defendant pleaded non…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Stoetzell v. FullertonIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Coursen v. HixonIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Rooney v. MoultonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  5. Higgins v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API