Legal Opinion

Rose v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 28, 1968No. 40991PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is felony theft; the punishment, five years.

Appellant’s first and principal ground of error is that the court denied his request to inspect a document in the possession of a witness. During the testimony of Bryan Thompson, director of personnel at the plant from which the property was stolen, appellant’s counsel stated, “We object to the reading of notes, etc. while he is testifying.” On the next page, counsel again stated, “Your Honor, we object to the reading of this material unless we have a chance to look at them, etc., and see what they, are,” The Court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sewell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
  2. Vannerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Fellers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Grice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Watkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Mendoza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Hart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  4. Hoffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Zanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API