Legal Opinion

Cresson v. Dispatch Printing Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided June 11, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, District Judge.

The discussion on this motion has taken wide range, but’the vital questions involved are few in number. It is not disputed that the report of the special committee of the House of Representatives was itself an absolutely privileged communication, and this is true, even though it contained false statements charging plaintiff with crime, and even though the statements were made with malice.

It cannot be disputed that newspaper accounts of the report and comments thereon may have a qualified or conditional privilege. The conditions are (1) that the accounts and comments be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tawney v. Simonson, Whitcomb & Hurley Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Fullerton v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Cresson v. Wortham-Carter Pub. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frank Pape v. Time, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  2. Cresson v. North American Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Cresson v. Louisville Courier-JournalCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
  4. Frank Pape v. Time, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API