Legal Opinion
T. H. Mastin & Co. v. Pickering Lumber Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 28, 1933No. 2885KPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERRIGAN, District Judge.
This 'case presents a novel problem in receivership administration in California, namely, what priority have claimants under workmen’s compensation awards for injuries suffered before the receivership, in the assets of the receivership of a company which acted as a self-insurer under the California Workmen’s Compensation Act (Deering’s Gen. Laws 1933, Act 4749) ? The problem is not *606only new, but it presents considerable difficulty. Counsel have rendered the fullest assistance to the court by their able and full discussion of the subject in their briefs.
The matter…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marshall v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Orem v. WrightsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- Schmidtman v. Atlantic Phosphate & Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Pond v. DoughertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Fitzgerald v. MeyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bowen v. HockleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. OAK GROVE UNION SCH. DIST. OF SONOMA CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Street v. Pacific Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Pyrites Co. v. Davison Chemical Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1933
- In re Charles Nelson Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.