Commonwealth v. Diggs (SJC 12008) Commonwealth v. Soto
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
Duffly, J,
The defendants, Marcel A, Diggs and Damiane K, Soto, challenge orders for pretrial detention imposed by District Court judges after hearings at which the judges concluded that each defendant was dangerous within the meaning of G. L, c. 276, § 58A (dangerousness statute). Under that statute, a person “held under arrest” on charges of one of an enumerated list of offenses may be subject to “a hearing to determine whether conditions of release will reasonably assure the safety of any other person or the community.” G. L. c. 276, § 58A (4). The defendants argue that neither of them was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Industrial Finance Corp. v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Aime v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Attorney General v. School Committee of EssexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Watros v. Greater Lynn Mental Health & Retardation Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Boston Police Patrolmen's Ass'n v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Casseus v. E. Bus Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. G.F.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Georges v. CarneyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- Benoit v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
- New England Power Generators Association, Inc. v. Department of Environmental ProtectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.