Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 20, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Sampson

Affirming.

The trial court directed a verdict for the railway company in this case, wherein appellant, Goldberg, sued to recover damages of the railway company for the negligent destruction of his automobile, which had stopped upon a railroad crossing just as a fast passenger train came along at night.

Appellant was not with the car at the time it was struck by the train. Pour other persons had been driving the car that evening. One of them testified concerning the accident:

“When we got half-way down, or about one-third way down, that street we saw a freight…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Horton v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. Louisville Railway Co. v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Louisville Railway Co. v. ThornberryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  4. Maples v. Louisville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hensley v. BradenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  2. Coburn v. Louisville N. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  3. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. RossCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API