Legal Opinion

Stoddard v. President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term, Washington county, Action by Clarence F. Stoddard against the president, managers, and company of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Company. From an order changing the place of trial plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLearned, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order changing the place of trial on the ground that an impartial trial cannot be had in Washington county, named in the complaint. This is plainly a question of fact; and the opinion of the learned justice at special term should be followed, unless very ■evident error has been committed. The facts stated by the defendant on the motion are very strong. The cause of action arose out of a railroad accident, by which a large number of persons were injured, most of them residents of Washington county. There many of them have made claims against defendant for damages…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Althiser v. Richmondville Creamery Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  2. Althiser v. Richmondville Creamery Co.New York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. In re the Estate of RobertsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API