Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Citizens' Nat. Bank

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 17, 1932No. 2625PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Me VICAR, District Judge.

This is a suit for the purpose of recovering a deposit whieh the plaintiff claims is held in trust for it. Issues were formed by the bill and answer. The following findings of fact and conclusions of law are made:

Findings of Fact.

The facts are found as stated in the “Agreed Statement of Facts” of the parties filed herewith.

Conclusions of Law.

1. The contract between the plaintiff and the Citizens’ National Bank did not create an •express trust.

2. The bank was not hopelessly or irretrievably insolvent when the deposits of October 3 and 5,1931, were made, therefore an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Blakey v. BrinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Brennan v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
  5. In re BolognesiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Kountze Bros.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938
  2. Lothrop v. SeabornNevada Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Brown v. BotkinDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1935
  4. Erie R. v. MizellDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API